Home › Oklahoma › Best Middle Schools

Best Middle Schools in Oklahoma (2025-26)

Ranked middle schools

286

Listed, not ranked

Every ranked middle school in Oklahoma, ordered by SchoolGrade. A grade rewards actual test performance against the projection for each school's student context, so a B in a high-poverty school can outrank an A- elsewhere on impact. Click a column heading to sort, or filter by school, city or district.

Oklahoma rankings: High Schools · Middle Schools · Elementary Schools

Oklahoma middle schools ranked

Rank	Grade	School	City	District	Actual	Projected	Impact	Students
#1	A	Chisholm MS	Enid	Chisholm	59%	48%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	266
#2	B+	Bethany MS	Bethany	Bethany	50%	44%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	390
#3	B+	Brink Jhs	Oklahoma City	Moore	49%	46%	Exceeds Expectations	666
#4	B	Classen MS Of Advanced Studies	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	47%	32%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	855
#5	B	Deer Creek MS	Edmond	Deer Creek	47%	50%	Meets Expectations	1,179
#6	B	Central MS	Edmond	Edmond	45%	37%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	980
#7	B	Southridge Jhs	Oklahoma City	Moore	45%	43%	Exceeds Expectations	591
#8	B	Cheyenne MS	Edmond	Edmond	44%	48%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	851
#9	B-	Cherokee MS	Cherokee	Cherokee	42%	36%	Exceeds Expectations	90
#10	B-	Belle Isle MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	41%	32%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	475
#11	B-	Plainview MS	Ardmore	Plainview	41%	36%	Exceeds Expectations	339
#12	B-	Sequoyah MS	Edmond	Edmond	41%	49%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	1,006
#13	B-	Amber Pocasset MS	Amber	Amber-Pocasset	40%	36%	Exceeds Expectations	66
#14	B-	Deer Creek Intermediate School	Edmond	Deer Creek	40%	52%	Underperforms Expectations	586
#15	B-	Durant MS	Durant	Durant	40%	30%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	589
#16	B-	Obuch MS	Antlers	Antlers	39%	21%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	226
#17	C+	Stillwater Jhs	Stillwater	Stillwater	39%	37%	Meets Expectations	884
#18	C+	Hydro Eakly MS	Hydro	Hydro-Eakly	38%	24%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	98
#19	C+	Bethel MS	Shawnee	Bethel	37%	34%	Exceeds Expectations	258
#20	C+	Blanchard MS	Blanchard	Blanchard	37%	36%	Meets Expectations	477
#21	C+	Grove MS	Grove	Grove	37%	33%	Exceeds Expectations	391
#22	C+	Piedmont MS	Piedmont	Piedmont	37%	42%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	772
#23	C+	Sulphur MS	Sulphur	Sulphur	37%	33%	Exceeds Expectations	336
#24	C+	Washington MS	Washington	Washington	37%	35%	Exceeds Expectations	279
#25	C+	Bridge Creek MS	Blanchard	Bridge Creek	36%	30%	Exceeds Expectations	401
#26	C+	Mannford MS	Mannford	Mannford	36%	27%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	336
#27	C	Chamberlain MS	Fairview	Fairview	35%	25%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	167
#28	C	Clinton MS	Clinton	Clinton	35%	25%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	282
#29	C	Mustang North MS	Yukon	Mustang	35%	30%	Exceeds Expectations	724
#30	C	Stratford MS	Stratford	Stratford	35%	24%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	139
#31	C	Whittier MS	Norman	Norman	35%	42%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	1,016
#32	C	Bixby MS	Bixby	Bixby	34%	37%	Meets Expectations	1,216
#33	C	Cache MS	Cache	Cache	34%	41%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	626
#34	C	Heartland MS	Edmond	Edmond	34%	48%	Underperforms Expectations	1,071
#35	C	Tahlequah MS	Tahlequah	Tahlequah	34%	30%	Exceeds Expectations	676
#36	C	Carver MS	Tulsa	Tulsa	33%	32%	Meets Expectations	656
#37	C	Cordell Jhs	Cordell	Cordell	33%	28%	Exceeds Expectations	137
#38	C	Mustang MS	Mustang	Mustang	33%	34%	Meets Expectations	723
#39	C	Wellston MS	Wellston	Wellston	33%	30%	Exceeds Expectations	126
#40	C	Adair MS	Adair	Adair	32%	27%	Exceeds Expectations	237
#41	C	Cimarron MS	Edmond	Edmond	32%	45%	Underperforms Expectations	866
#42	C	Elgin MS	Elgin	Elgin	32%	39%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	791
#43	C	Hobart MS	Hobart	Hobart	32%	27%	Exceeds Expectations	163
#44	C	Kingston MS	Kingston	Kingston	32%	29%	Exceeds Expectations	286
#45	C	Oliver MS	Broken Arrow	Broken Arrow	32%	36%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	898
#46	C	Stillwater MS	Stillwater	Stillwater	32%	37%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	932
#47	C	Summit MS	Edmond	Edmond	32%	48%	Underperforms Expectations	940
#48	C	Central MS	Bartlesville	Bartlesville	31%	28%	Exceeds Expectations	671
#49	C	Davis MS	Davis	Davis	31%	28%	Exceeds Expectations	264
#50	C	Highland East Jhs	Moore	Moore	31%	38%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	789
#51	C	Marlow MS	Marlow	Marlow	31%	31%	Meets Expectations	317
#52	C-	Nicoma Park MS	Choctaw	Choctaw-Nicoma Park	31%	37%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	622
#53	C-	Berryhill MS	Tulsa	Berryhill	30%	28%	Exceeds Expectations	174
#54	C-	Jenks MS	Jenks	Jenks	30%	40%	Underperforms Expectations	1,831
#55	C-	Minco MS	Minco	Minco	30%	27%	Exceeds Expectations	131
#56	C-	Oneta Ridge MS	Broken Arrow	Broken Arrow	30%	38%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	924
#57	C-	Wallace Byrd MS	Coalgate	Coalgate	30%	25%	Exceeds Expectations	109
#58	C-	Alcott MS	Norman	Norman	29%	32%	Meets Expectations	713
#59	C-	Altus Jhs	Altus	Altus	29%	33%	Meets Expectations	491
#60	C-	Collinsville MS	Collinsville	Collinsville	29%	34%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	462
#61	C-	Ewing Halsell MS	Vinita	Vinita	29%	26%	Exceeds Expectations	307
#62	C-	Jones MS	Jones	Jones	29%	33%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	265
#63	C-	Mangum MS	Mangum	Mangum	29%	22%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	156
#64	C-	Muldrow MS	Muldrow	Muldrow	29%	26%	Exceeds Expectations	329
#65	C-	Sequoyah MS	Claremore	Sequoyah	29%	31%	Meets Expectations	297
#66	C-	Tuttle MS	Tuttle	Tuttle	29%	34%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	460
#67	C-	Childers MS	Broken Arrow	Broken Arrow	28%	32%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	796
#68	C-	Chouteau Mazie MS	Chouteau	Chouteau-Mazie	28%	25%	Exceeds Expectations	211
#69	C-	Dewitt Waller MS	Enid	Enid	28%	29%	Meets Expectations	735
#70	C-	Fort Gibson MS	Fort Gibson	Fort Gibson	28%	26%	Exceeds Expectations	394
#71	C-	Guthrie Jhs	Guthrie	Guthrie	28%	28%	Meets Expectations	496
#72	C-	Locust Grove MS	Locust Grove	Locust Grove	28%	24%	Exceeds Expectations	262
#73	C-	Mustang Central MS	Yukon	Mustang	28%	30%	Meets Expectations	554
#74	C-	Newman MS	Skiatook	Skiatook	28%	27%	Meets Expectations	508
#75	C-	Prague MS	Prague	Prague	28%	29%	Meets Expectations	215
#76	C-	Purcell Jhs	Purcell	Purcell	28%	26%	Exceeds Expectations	310
#77	C-	Thomas Fay Custer Unified Jhs	Thomas	Thomas-Fay-Custer Unified Dist	28%	22%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	112
#78	C-	Alva MS	Alva	Alva	27%	36%	Underperforms Expectations	241
#79	C-	Byng Jhs	Ada	Byng	27%	26%	Exceeds Expectations	357
#80	C-	Cushing MS	Cushing	Cushing	27%	26%	Meets Expectations	470
#81	C-	Sallisaw MS	Sallisaw	Sallisaw	27%	23%	Exceeds Expectations	431
#82	C-	Yukon MS	Yukon	Yukon	27%	31%	Meets Expectations	1,407
#83	D+	Chandler Jhs	Chandler	Chandler	27%	23%	Exceeds Expectations	160
#84	D+	Eufaula MS	Eufaula	Eufaula	27%	26%	Exceeds Expectations	285
#85	D+	Okarche Jhs	Okarche	Okarche	27%	30%	Meets Expectations	113
#86	D+	Wilburton MS	Wilburton	Wilburton	27%	24%	Exceeds Expectations	183
#87	D+	Woodward MS South Campus	Woodward	Woodward	27%	29%	Meets Expectations	378
#88	D+	Wright City Jhs	Wright City	Wright City	27%	23%	Exceeds Expectations	74
#89	D+	Centennial MS	Broken Arrow	Broken Arrow	26%	44%	Underperforms Expectations	1,121
#90	D+	Duncan MS	Duncan	Duncan	26%	24%	Exceeds Expectations	753
#91	D+	Hefner MS	Oklahoma City	Putnam City	26%	34%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	965
#92	D+	Longfellow MS	Norman	Norman	26%	27%	Meets Expectations	709
#93	D+	Will Rogers Jhs	Claremore	Claremore	26%	25%	Meets Expectations	807
#94	D+	Carl Albert MS	Oklahoma City	Midwest City-Del City	25%	30%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	834
#95	D+	Cashion MS	Cashion	Cashion	25%	34%	Underperforms Expectations	215
#96	D+	Clyde Boyd MS	Sand Springs	Sand Springs	25%	26%	Meets Expectations	1,116
#97	D+	Crescent MS	Crescent	Crescent	25%	25%	Meets Expectations	89
#98	D+	Dale MS	Dale	Dale	25%	28%	Meets Expectations	180
#99	D+	Edison Preparatory MS	Tulsa	Tulsa	25%	25%	Meets Expectations	822
#100	D+	Eisenhower MS	Lawton	Lawton	25%	25%	Meets Expectations	1,035
#101	D+	Frederick MS	Frederick	Frederick	25%	22%	Exceeds Expectations	174
#102	D+	Glenpool MS	Glenpool	Glenpool	25%	26%	Meets Expectations	442
#103	D+	Hennessey Upper ES	Hennessey	Hennessey	25%	26%	Meets Expectations	260
#104	D+	Latta MS	Ada	Latta	25%	27%	Meets Expectations	201
#105	D+	Madison MS	Bartlesville	Bartlesville	25%	25%	Meets Expectations	732
#106	D+	Pauls Valley Jhs	Pauls Valley	Pauls Valley	25%	23%	Exceeds Expectations	336
#107	D+	Silo MS	Durant	Silo	25%	29%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	246
#108	D+	Spiro MS	Spiro	Spiro	25%	23%	Exceeds Expectations	202
#109	D+	Verdigris Jhs	Claremore	Verdigris	25%	27%	Meets Expectations	208
#110	D+	Bristow MS	Bristow	Bristow	24%	24%	Meets Expectations	380
#111	D+	Choctaw MS	Choctaw	Choctaw-Nicoma Park	24%	29%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	725
#112	D+	Dove Science Academy MS (Charter)	Oklahoma City	Dove Schools of Okc (charter)	24%	26%	Meets Expectations	261
#113	D+	Geronimo MS	Geronimo	Geronimo	24%	30%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	50
#114	D+	Lindsay MS	Lindsay	Lindsay	24%	26%	Meets Expectations	234
#115	D+	Macarthur MS	Lawton	Lawton	24%	31%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	865
#116	D+	Morris MS	Morris	Morris	24%	25%	Meets Expectations	215
#117	D+	Pryor MS	Pryor	Pryor	24%	23%	Exceeds Expectations	650
#118	D+	Smithville MS	Smithville	Smithville	24%	23%	Meets Expectations	55
#119	D+	Weatherford MS	Weatherford	Weatherford	24%	27%	Meets Expectations	345
#120	D	Donald P Sloat Jhs	Coweta	Coweta	23%	32%	Underperforms Expectations	561
#121	D	Harrah MS	Harrah	Harrah	23%	24%	Meets Expectations	528
#122	D	Hilldale MS	Muskogee	Hilldale	23%	26%	Meets Expectations	473
#123	D	Idabel MS	Idabel	Idabel	23%	26%	Meets Expectations	253
#124	D	Kansas MS	Kansas	Kansas	23%	17%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	173
#125	D	Rush Springs MS	Rush Springs	Rush Springs	23%	25%	Meets Expectations	108
#126	D	Salina MS	Salina	Salina	23%	17%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	159
#127	D	Walters MS	Walters	Walters	23%	21%	Exceeds Expectations	140
#128	D	Central MS	Lawton	Lawton	22%	23%	Meets Expectations	994
#129	D	Checotah MS	Checotah	Checotah	22%	21%	Meets Expectations	330
#130	D	Cleveland MS	Cleveland	Cleveland	22%	22%	Meets Expectations	410
#131	D	Hinton MS	Hinton	Hinton	22%	24%	Meets Expectations	187
#132	D	Hollis MS	Hollis	Hollis	22%	22%	Meets Expectations	108
#133	D	Irving MS	Norman	Norman	22%	26%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	788
#134	D	Newcastle MS	Newcastle	Newcastle	22%	25%	Meets Expectations	591
#135	D	Oklahoma Union MS	South Coffeyville	Oklahoma Union	22%	21%	Meets Expectations	150
#136	D	Oologah Talala MS	Oologah	Oologah-Talala	22%	25%	Meets Expectations	380
#137	D	Pawnee MS	Pawnee	Pawnee	22%	19%	Exceeds Expectations	143
#138	D	Pocola MS	Pocola	Pocola	22%	20%	Exceeds Expectations	155
#139	D	Rattan Jhs	Rattan	Rattan	22%	14%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	74
#140	D	Rongey MS	Kiefer	Kiefer	22%	26%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	136
#141	D	Watonga MS	Watonga	Watonga	22%	20%	Exceeds Expectations	170
#142	D	Dewey MS	Dewey	Dewey	21%	22%	Meets Expectations	269
#143	D	Fletcher Jhs	Fletcher	Fletcher	21%	28%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	77
#144	D	Inola MS	Inola	Inola	21%	23%	Meets Expectations	275
#145	D	Little Axe MS	Norman	Little Axe	21%	21%	Meets Expectations	256
#146	D	Lone Grove MS	Lone Grove	Lone Grove	21%	30%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	305
#147	D	Perkins Tryon MS	Perkins	Perkins-Tryon	21%	24%	Meets Expectations	356
#148	D	Chelsea MS	Chelsea	Chelsea	20%	19%	Meets Expectations	162
#149	D	Comanche MS	Comanche	Comanche	20%	23%	Meets Expectations	190
#150	D	Cooper MS	Oklahoma City	Putnam City	20%	25%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	621
#151	D	Fairland MS	Fairland	Fairland	20%	20%	Meets Expectations	133
#152	D	Highland West Jhs	Moore	Moore	20%	21%	Meets Expectations	545
#153	D	Jay MS	Jay	JAY	20%	23%	Meets Expectations	248
#154	D	Kellyville MS	Kellyville	Kellyville	20%	20%	Meets Expectations	107
#155	D	Rector Johnson MS	Broken Bow	Broken Bow	20%	22%	Meets Expectations	324
#156	D	Sperry MS	Sperry	Sperry	20%	25%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	232
#157	D	Tecumseh MS	Tecumseh	Tecumseh	20%	20%	Meets Expectations	451
#158	D	Wagoner MS	Wagoner	Wagoner	20%	21%	Meets Expectations	469
#159	D	Waurika MS	Waurika	Waurika	20%	20%	Meets Expectations	100
#160	D	Beggs MS	Beggs	Beggs	19%	26%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	287
#161	D	Central Jhs	Moore	Moore	19%	23%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	615
#162	D	Curtis Inge MS	Noble	Noble	19%	24%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	712
#163	D	Ponca City West MS	Ponca City	Ponca City	19%	22%	Meets Expectations	686
#164	D-	Sapulpa Jhs	Sapulpa	Sapulpa	22%	27%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	599
#165	D-	Luther MS	Luther	Luther	19%	26%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	239
#166	D-	Ninnekah MS	Ninnekah	Ninnekah	19%	21%	Meets Expectations	111
#167	D-	Thoreau Demonstration Academy	Tulsa	Tulsa	19%	27%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	442
#168	D-	Tishomingo MS	Tishomingo	Tishomingo	19%	20%	Meets Expectations	235
#169	D-	Tulsa Honor Academy Charter (Charter)	Tulsa	Honor Academy(charter)	19%	17%	Meets Expectations	429
#170	D-	Ada Jhs	Ada	ADA	18%	23%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	606
#171	D-	Commerce MS	Commerce	Commerce	18%	20%	Meets Expectations	181
#172	D-	Emerson MS	Enid	Enid	18%	20%	Meets Expectations	401
#173	D-	Gore Upper ES	Gore	Gore	18%	20%	Meets Expectations	118
#174	D-	James L Capps MS	Warr Acres	Putnam City	18%	22%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	975
#175	D-	Ketchum MS	Ketchum	Ketchum	18%	20%	Meets Expectations	130
#176	D-	Madill MS	Madill	Madill	18%	20%	Meets Expectations	373
#177	D-	Marietta MS	Marietta	Marietta	18%	21%	Meets Expectations	252
#178	D-	Meeker MS	Meeker	Meeker	18%	18%	Meets Expectations	162
#179	D-	Nowata MS	Nowata	Nowata	18%	19%	Meets Expectations	163
#180	D-	Pioneer Pleasant Vale Jhs	Waukomis	Pioneer-Pleasant Vale	18%	22%	Meets Expectations	73
#181	D-	Union 6th 7th Grade Ctr	Tulsa	Union	18%	25%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	2,182
#182	D-	Wells MS	Catoosa	Catoosa	18%	22%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	405
#183	D-	Arkoma MS	Arkoma	Arkoma	17%	24%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	106
#184	D-	Cyril Jhs	Cyril	Cyril	17%	18%	Meets Expectations	62
#185	D-	Haworth MS	Haworth	Haworth	17%	17%	Meets Expectations	111
#186	D-	Henryetta MS	Henryetta	Henryetta	17%	20%	Meets Expectations	242
#187	D-	Mclish MS	Stonewall	Stonewall	17%	20%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	131
#188	D-	Perry Jhs	Perry	Perry	17%	22%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	165
#189	D-	Seminole MS	Seminole	Seminole	17%	18%	Meets Expectations	206
#190	D-	Sequoyah MS	Broken Arrow	Broken Arrow	17%	22%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	720
#191	D-	Stroud MS	Stroud	Stroud	17%	25%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	195
#192	D-	Tulsa Schl Arts Sciences MS (Charter)	Tulsa	Schl Arts/sci (charter)	17%	23%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	234
#193	D-	Weleetka Jhs	Weleetka	Weleetka	17%	18%	Meets Expectations	75
#194	D-	Wynnewood MS	Wynnewood	Wynnewood	17%	21%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	214
#195	D-	Apache MS	Apache	Boone-Apache	16%	17%	Meets Expectations	124
#196	D-	Central Jhs	Guymon	Guymon	16%	28%	Underperforms Expectations	438
#197	D-	Chickasha MS	Chickasha	Chickasha	16%	23%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	316
#198	D-	Sapulpa MS	Sapulpa	Sapulpa	16%	20%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	487
#199	D-	Seiling JR SR HS JR	Seiling	Seiling	16%	20%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	86
#200	D-	Stigler MS	Stigler	Stigler	16%	19%	Meets Expectations	354
#201	D-	Western Oaks MS	Bethany	Putnam City	16%	18%	Meets Expectations	656
#202	D-	Carnegie MS	Carnegie	Carnegie	15%	18%	Meets Expectations	131
#203	D-	Hulbert MS	Hulbert	Hulbert	15%	16%	Meets Expectations	121
#204	D-	Mcloud Jhs	Mcloud	Mcloud	15%	23%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	289
#205	D-	Navajo Jhs	Altus	Navajo	15%	35%	Underperforms Expectations	70
#206	D-	Panama MS	Panama	Panama	15%	16%	Meets Expectations	104
#207	D-	Ringling Jhs	Ringling	Ringling	15%	18%	Meets Expectations	87
#208	D-	Sayre MS	Sayre	Sayre	15%	18%	Meets Expectations	174
#209	D-	Traice MS	Tulsa	Tulsa	15%	21%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	229
#210	D-	Velma Alma MS	Velma	Velma-Alma	15%	23%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	102
#211	D-	Wyandotte MS	Wyandotte	Wyandotte	15%	18%	Meets Expectations	178
#212	D-	Bluejacket MS	Bluejacket	Bluejacket	14%	15%	Meets Expectations	44
#213	D-	Caney Valley MS	Ramona	Caney Valley	14%	19%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	167
#214	D-	Dickson MS	Ardmore	Dickson	14%	27%	Underperforms Expectations	293
#215	D-	Foyil Jhs	Foyil	Foyil	14%	17%	Meets Expectations	96
#216	D-	Newkirk MS	Newkirk	Newkirk	14%	15%	Meets Expectations	180
#217	D-	North Rock Creek MS	Shawnee	North Rock Creek	14%	20%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	150
#218	D-	Virgil Cooper MS	Drumright	Drumright	14%	15%	Meets Expectations	93
#219	D-	Westville Jhs	Westville	Westville	14%	19%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	132
#220	D-	Ardmore MS	Ardmore	Ardmore	13%	15%	Meets Expectations	498
#221	D-	Astec Charter MS (Charter)	Oklahoma City	Astec Charters	13%	23%	Underperforms Expectations	393
#222	D-	Hugo MS	Hugo	Hugo	13%	20%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	263
#223	D-	Valliant MS	Valliant	Valliant	13%	17%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	200
#224	D-	Yale MS	Yale	Yale	13%	17%	Meets Expectations	74
#225	F	West Jhs	Oklahoma City	Moore	13%	18%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	652
#226	F	Agra Jhs	Agra	Agra	12%	20%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	46
#227	F	Anadarko MS	Anadarko	Anadarko	12%	15%	Meets Expectations	303
#228	F	Boswell MS	Boswell	Boswell	12%	14%	Meets Expectations	47
#229	F	Colbert MS	Colbert	Colbert	12%	15%	Meets Expectations	117
#230	F	Crooked Oak MS	Oklahoma City	Crooked Oak	12%	13%	Meets Expectations	275
#231	F	Elmore City Jhs	Elmore City	Elmore City-Pernell	12%	19%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	107
#232	F	Etta Dale Jhs	El Reno	El Reno	12%	20%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	444
#233	F	Geary MS	Geary	Geary	12%	17%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	53
#234	F	Midwest City MS	Midwest City	Midwest City-Del City	12%	18%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	1,046
#235	F	Putnam Heights Academy MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	12%	19%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	34
#236	F	Shawnee MS	Shawnee	Shawnee	12%	16%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	711
#237	F	Shidler MS	Shidler	Shidler	12%	27%	Underperforms Expectations	51
#238	F	Southeast MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	12%	26%	Underperforms Expectations	733
#239	F	Thackerville MS	Thackerville	Thackerville	12%	23%	Underperforms Expectations	60
#240	F	Tonkawa MS	Tonkawa	Tonkawa	12%	16%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	176
#241	F	Vian MS	Vian	Vian	12%	21%	Underperforms Expectations	159
#242	F	Welch MS	Welch	Welch	12%	17%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	63
#243	F	Blackwell MS	Blackwell	Blackwell	11%	17%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	259
#244	F	Elk City MS	Elk City	Elk City	11%	29%	Underperforms Expectations	306
#245	F	Empire MS	Duncan	Empire	11%	17%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	109
#246	F	Haskell MS	Haskell	Haskell	11%	13%	Meets Expectations	147
#247	F	Lexington MS	Lexington	Lexington	11%	17%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	223
#248	F	Mayfield MS	Oklahoma City	Putnam City	11%	14%	Meets Expectations	850
#249	F	Okeene JR SR HS JR	Okeene	Okeene	11%	16%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	46
#250	F	Wayne MS	Wayne	Wayne	11%	14%	Meets Expectations	99
#251	F	Dibble MS	Blanchard	Dibble	10%	16%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	166
#252	F	Longfellow MS	Enid	Enid	10%	19%	Underperforms Expectations	503
#253	F	Morrison MS	Morrison	Morrison	10%	22%	Underperforms Expectations	88
#254	F	Santa Fe South MS (Charter)	Oklahoma City	Santa Fe South (charter)	10%	26%	Underperforms Expectations	751
#255	F	Talihina Jhs	Talihina	Talihina	10%	20%	Underperforms Expectations	78
#256	F	Woodland Upper ES	Fairfax	Woodland	10%	18%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	81
#257	F	Del City MS	Del City	Midwest City-Del City	9%	24%	Underperforms Expectations	925
#258	F	Healdton MS	Healdton	Healdton	9%	14%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	115
#259	F	Okemah MS	Okemah	Okemah	9%	19%	Underperforms Expectations	162
#260	F	Roland MS	Roland	Roland	9%	20%	Underperforms Expectations	195
#261	F	Stilwell MS	Stilwell	Stilwell	9%	19%	Underperforms Expectations	275
#262	F	Dunbar Intermediate ES	Okmulgee	Okmulgee	8%	13%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	322
#263	F	Memorial MS	Tulsa	Tulsa	8%	24%	Underperforms Expectations	626
#264	F	Pawhuska MS	Pawhuska	Pawhuska	8%	22%	Underperforms Expectations	152
#265	F	Quapaw MS	Quapaw	Quapaw	8%	15%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	134
#266	F	Wewoka MS	Wewoka	Wewoka	8%	13%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	91
#267	F	Fort Towson Jhs	Fort Towson	Fort Towson	7%	10%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	45
#268	F	Millwood Arts Academy MS	Oklahoma City	Millwood	7%	20%	Underperforms Expectations	260
#269	F	Western Heights MS	Oklahoma City	Western Heights	7%	29%	Underperforms Expectations	442
#270	F	Hartshorne MS	Hartshorne	Hartshorne	6%	12%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	165
#271	F	Kipp Tulsa Acad College Prep (Charter)	Tulsa	Kipp (charter)	6%	17%	Underperforms Expectations	321
#272	F	Taft MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	6%	23%	Underperforms Expectations	1,045
#273	F	Will Rogers College MS	Tulsa	Tulsa	6%	21%	Underperforms Expectations	694
#274	F	Central MS	Tulsa	Tulsa	5%	19%	Underperforms Expectations	293
#275	F	Dewar MS	Dewar	Dewar	5%	10%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	119
#276	F	Hominy MS	Hominy	Hominy	5%	18%	Underperforms Expectations	118
#277	F	Jefferson MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	5%	21%	Underperforms Expectations	919
#278	F	Roosevelt MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	5%	20%	Underperforms Expectations	853
#279	F	John Marshall MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	4%	20%	Underperforms Expectations	626
#280	F	Mary Golda Ross MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	4%	20%	Underperforms Expectations	819
#281	F	Capitol Hill MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	3%	20%	Underperforms Expectations	669
#282	F	Daniel Webster MS	Tulsa	Tulsa	3%	23%	Underperforms Expectations	350
#283	F	Moon MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	3%	14%	Underperforms Expectations	679
#284	F	Webster MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	3%	20%	Underperforms Expectations	810
#285	F	Wheeler MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	3%	20%	Underperforms Expectations	538
#286	F	Monroe Demonstration MS	Tulsa	Tulsa	1%	6%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	688

How Oklahoma's middle schools compare

A: 1B: 15C: 66D: 142F: 62

6% of the 286 ranked middle schools in Oklahoma earn an A or B (1 A grades, 15 B, 66 C, 142 D, 62 F), against 47% of middle schools nationwide. 163 schools meet or beat the proficiency projected from their student context (57% here, 71% nationally), and 60 exceed it. On average 22% of tested students meet the state bar against a projected 25% (national averages: 39% actual, 38% projected).

The biggest overperformers, by actual proficiency above projection: Obuch MS (39% against 21%, B-), Classen MS Of Advanced Studies (47% against 32%, B), Hydro Eakly MS (38% against 24%, C+), Chisholm MS (59% against 48%, A), Stratford MS (35% against 24%, C).

Districts with the most schools in the top quarter (the top 72): Edmond (6), Moore (3), Broken Arrow (3), Oklahoma City (2).

Cities with the most ranked middle schools: Oklahoma City (26, 4 at A or B), Tulsa (14, 0 at A or B), Edmond (8, 5 at A or B), Norman (5, 0 at A or B), Broken Arrow (5, 0 at A or B).

The largest ranked middle schools: Union 6th 7th Grade Ctr (2,182 students, D-, #181), Jenks MS (1,831 students, C-, #54), Yukon MS (1,407 students, C-, #82).

Middle schools in Oklahoma that are not ranked

18 graded middle schools are listed here rather than ranked, each for the reason given. Every one has its own page with its full SchoolGrade report.

Special-purpose schools (1)

Alternative, special-education and vocational schools serve a different mission and a different student body, so they are graded but not ranked against regular schools.

D Emerson Alternative Ed MS, Oklahoma City

Fully online schools (4)

Statewide virtual schools draw students from everywhere, so a place ranking is not a fair comparison.

D+ Eschool Virtual Charter MS, Guthrie
F Insight School Of Oklahoma MS, Midwest City
D- Okla Virtual Charter Acad MS, Midwest City
D+ Oklahoma Connections Acad MS, Bartlesville

Closed schools (5)

NCES lists these schools as closed or inactive since their last graded year.

C- Dove Virtual Academy Middle School, Edmond
D Fort Cobb Broxton MS, Fort Cobb
D Pond Creek Hunter MS, Pond Creek
C+ Puterbaugh MS, Mcalester
F Star Spencer MS, Oklahoma City

Not yet graded (8)

Too little test data to grade.

Central High MS, Marlow
Coweta Intermediate HS, Coweta
Dove Science Academy Middle School South Okc, Oklahoma City
Independence Charter MS, Oklahoma City
Kingfisher Junior High School, Kingfisher
Konowa Junior High School, Konawa
Miami JR HS, Miami
Oklahoma Schl For The Blind MS, Muskogee

About this ranking

Scope: every public middle school in Oklahoma.
Order: SchoolGrade, then actual proficiency, then name; schools with the same grade and score share a rank.
Ranked: regular public schools that NCES lists as open, not fully online, with at least 30 students. Others are listed with the reason.
Tags: Magnet and Charter from the NCES school directory; K-12 marks schools serving every grade that are ranked with the middle schools.
Grades are the 2025-26 SchoolGrade model. How SchoolGrade works

Questions about middle schools in Oklahoma

What is the best middle school in Oklahoma?

Chisholm MS in Enid ranks first among the 286 ranked middle schools in Oklahoma with a SchoolGrade of A, 59% of tested students meeting the state bar against a projected 48%.

How are middle schools in Oklahoma ranked?

By SchoolGrade, the 2025-26 model that scores each school's actual test proficiency against the level projected for its student context, then by actual proficiency to break ties. Regular public schools that are open, not fully online and have at least 30 students are ranked; the rest are listed below the table with the reason.

How many middle schools does Oklahoma have?

SchoolGrade grades 304 public middle schools in Oklahoma; 286 are ranked here and 18 are listed as not ranked.