Best Middle Schools in Oklahoma (2025-26)

Ranked middle schools

308

Listed, not ranked

Every ranked middle school in Oklahoma, ordered by SchoolGrade. A grade rewards actual test performance against the projection for each school's student context, so a B in a high-poverty school can outrank an A- elsewhere on impact. Click a column heading to sort, or filter by school, city or district.

Oklahoma rankings: High Schools · Middle Schools · Elementary Schools

Oklahoma middle schools ranked

Rank	Grade	School	City	District	Actual	Projected	Impact	Students
#1	A+	Chisholm MS	Enid	Chisholm	63%	27%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	266
#2	A+	Bethany MS	Bethany	Bethany	59%	36%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	390
#3	A+	Classen MS Of Advanced Studies	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	58%	61%	Meets Expectations	855
#4	A+	Deer Creek MS	Edmond	Deer Creek	51%	47%	Exceeds Expectations	1,179
#5	A+	Thomas Fay Custer Unified Jhs	Thomas	Thomas-Fay-Custer Unified Dist	51%	21%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	112
#6	A+	Brink Jhs	Oklahoma City	Moore	50%	39%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	666
#7	A+	Piedmont MS	Piedmont	Piedmont	48%	45%	Exceeds Expectations	772
#8	A+	Southridge Jhs	Oklahoma City	Moore	48%	40%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	591
#9	A+	Stillwater Jhs	Stillwater	Stillwater	48%	33%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	884
#10	A+	Deer Creek Intermediate School	Edmond	Deer Creek	47%	46%	Meets Expectations	586
#11	A+	Central MS	Edmond	Edmond	46%	54%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	980
#12	A+	Cheyenne MS	Edmond	Edmond	46%	42%	Exceeds Expectations	851
#13	A+	Morrison MS	Morrison	Morrison	46%	23%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	88
#14	A+	Belle Isle MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	45%	48%	Meets Expectations	475
#15	A+	Minco MS	Minco	Minco	45%	20%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	131
#16	A+	Dove Science Academy MS (Charter)	Oklahoma City	Dove Schools of Okc (charter)	44%	20%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	261
#17	A+	Fort Gibson MS	Fort Gibson	Fort Gibson	44%	25%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	394
#18	A+	Mustang North MS	Yukon	Mustang	44%	38%	Exceeds Expectations	724
#19	A+	Sequoyah MS	Edmond	Edmond	43%	39%	Exceeds Expectations	1,006
#20	A	Blanchard MS	Blanchard	Blanchard	43%	38%	Exceeds Expectations	477
#21	A	Elk City MS	Elk City	Elk City	43%	33%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	306
#22	A	Mclish MS	Stonewall	Stonewall	43%	24%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	131
#23	A	Okarche Jhs	Okarche	Okarche	43%	38%	Exceeds Expectations	113
#24	A	Stillwater MS	Stillwater	Stillwater	43%	34%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	932
#25	A	Washington MS	Washington	Washington	43%	38%	Exceeds Expectations	279
#26	A	Gore Upper ES	Gore	Gore	41%	18%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	118
#27	A	Nicoma Park MS	Choctaw	Choctaw-Nicoma Park	41%	27%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	622
#28	A	Mustang MS	Mustang	Mustang	40%	34%	Exceeds Expectations	723
#29	A	Owasso 6th Grade Ctr	Owasso	Owasso	40%	37%	Exceeds Expectations	774
#30	A	Tuttle MS	Tuttle	Tuttle	40%	39%	Meets Expectations	460
#31	A	Wilson 6th Grade Center	Collinsville	Collinsville	40%	32%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	236
#32	A	Chandler Jhs	Chandler	Chandler	39%	29%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	160
#33	A	Cherokee MS	Cherokee	Cherokee	39%	31%	Exceeds Expectations	90
#34	A	Cimarron MS	Edmond	Edmond	39%	37%	Meets Expectations	866
#35	A	Dove Science Academy Middle School South Okc (Charter)	Oklahoma City	Dove Schools of Okc (charter)	39%	22%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	292
#36	A	Hydro Eakly MS	Hydro	Hydro-Eakly	39%	25%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	98
#37	A	Pocola MS	Pocola	Pocola	39%	23%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	155
#38	A	Carver MS	Tulsa	Tulsa	38%	53%	Underperforms Expectations	656
#39	A	Heartland MS	Edmond	Edmond	38%	35%	Exceeds Expectations	1,071
#40	A	Latta MS	Ada	Latta	38%	20%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	201
#41	A	Perry Jhs	Perry	Perry	38%	25%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	165
#42	A	Chamberlain MS	Fairview	Fairview	37%	27%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	167
#43	A-	Amber Pocasset MS	Amber	Amber-Pocasset	37%	24%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	66
#44	A-	Cashion MS	Cashion	Cashion	37%	35%	Meets Expectations	215
#45	A-	Eufaula MS	Eufaula	Eufaula	37%	22%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	285
#46	A-	Whittier MS	Norman	Norman	37%	39%	Meets Expectations	1,016
#47	A-	Cache MS	Cache	Cache	36%	34%	Meets Expectations	626
#48	A-	Checotah MS	Checotah	Checotah	36%	21%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	330
#49	A-	Highland East Jhs	Moore	Moore	36%	35%	Meets Expectations	789
#50	A-	Jenks MS	Jenks	Jenks	36%	46%	Underperforms Expectations	1,831
#51	A-	Mustang Central MS	Yukon	Mustang	36%	32%	Exceeds Expectations	554
#52	A-	Obuch MS	Antlers	Antlers	36%	22%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	226
#53	A-	Owasso 7th Grade Ctr	Owasso	Owasso	36%	37%	Meets Expectations	757
#54	A-	Pioneer Pleasant Vale Jhs	Waukomis	Pioneer-Pleasant Vale	36%	24%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	73
#55	A-	Santa Fe South MS (Charter)	Oklahoma City	Santa Fe South (charter)	36%	15%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	751
#56	A-	Tahlequah MS	Tahlequah	Tahlequah	36%	24%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	676
#57	A-	Alcott MS	Norman	Norman	35%	29%	Exceeds Expectations	713
#58	A-	Clyde Boyd MS	Sand Springs	Sand Springs	35%	27%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	1,116
#59	A-	Empire MS	Duncan	Empire	35%	25%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	109
#60	A-	Frederick MS	Frederick	Frederick	35%	19%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	174
#61	A-	Guthrie Jhs	Guthrie	Guthrie	35%	23%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	496
#62	A-	Plainview MS	Ardmore	Plainview	35%	27%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	339
#63	A-	Purcell Jhs	Purcell	Purcell	35%	27%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	310
#64	A-	Verdigris Jhs	Claremore	Verdigris	35%	34%	Meets Expectations	208
#65	A-	Wright City Jhs	Wright City	Wright City	35%	17%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	74
#66	A-	Bridge Creek MS	Blanchard	Bridge Creek	34%	31%	Exceeds Expectations	401
#67	B+	7th And 8th Grade Academic Ctr	Poteau	Poteau	34%	23%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	362
#68	B+	Chickasha MS	Chickasha	Chickasha	34%	20%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	316
#69	B+	Edison Preparatory MS	Tulsa	Tulsa	34%	45%	Underperforms Expectations	822
#70	B+	Ewing Halsell MS	Vinita	Vinita	34%	22%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	307
#71	B+	Hennessey Upper ES	Hennessey	Hennessey	34%	36%	Meets Expectations	260
#72	B+	Jones MS	Jones	Jones	33%	25%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	265
#73	B+	Thackerville MS	Thackerville	Thackerville	33%	27%	Exceeds Expectations	60
#74	B+	Yukon MS	Yukon	Yukon	33%	36%	Meets Expectations	1,407
#75	B+	Choctaw MS	Choctaw	Choctaw-Nicoma Park	32%	31%	Meets Expectations	725
#76	B+	Curtis Inge MS	Noble	Noble	32%	28%	Exceeds Expectations	712
#77	B+	Dibble MS	Blanchard	Dibble	32%	21%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	166
#78	B+	Elgin MS	Elgin	Elgin	32%	40%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	791
#79	B+	Hilldale MS	Muskogee	Hilldale	32%	27%	Exceeds Expectations	473
#80	B+	Kingfisher Junior High School	Kingfisher	Kingfisher	32%	29%	Exceeds Expectations	213
#81	B+	Silo MS	Durant	Silo	32%	31%	Meets Expectations	246
#82	B+	Summit MS	Edmond	Edmond	32%	35%	Meets Expectations	940
#83	B+	Valliant MS	Valliant	Valliant	32%	22%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	200
#84	B+	Watonga MS	Watonga	Watonga	32%	20%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	170
#85	B+	Bethel MS	Shawnee	Bethel	31%	28%	Exceeds Expectations	258
#86	B+	Marlow MS	Marlow	Marlow	31%	27%	Exceeds Expectations	317
#87	B	Sequoyah MS	Claremore	Sequoyah	31%	30%	Meets Expectations	297
#88	B	Stratford MS	Stratford	Stratford	31%	28%	Exceeds Expectations	139
#89	B	Cordell Jhs	Cordell	Cordell	30%	21%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	137
#90	B	Cushing MS	Cushing	Cushing	30%	32%	Meets Expectations	470
#91	B	Cyril Jhs	Cyril	Cyril	30%	17%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	62
#92	B	Dale MS	Dale	Dale	30%	34%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	180
#93	B	Durant MS	Durant	Durant	30%	30%	Meets Expectations	589
#94	B	Ketchum MS	Ketchum	Ketchum	30%	30%	Meets Expectations	130
#95	B	Mangum MS	Mangum	Mangum	30%	27%	Exceeds Expectations	156
#96	B	Navajo Jhs	Altus	Navajo	30%	28%	Meets Expectations	70
#97	B	Oneta Ridge MS	Broken Arrow	Broken Arrow	30%	40%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	924
#98	B	Weatherford MS	Weatherford	Weatherford	30%	35%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	345
#99	B	Wilburton MS	Wilburton	Wilburton	30%	20%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	183
#100	B	Bixby MS	Bixby	Bixby	29%	42%	Underperforms Expectations	1,216
#101	B	Central MS	Bartlesville	Bartlesville	29%	28%	Meets Expectations	671
#102	B	Grove MS	Grove	Grove	29%	40%	Underperforms Expectations	391
#103	B	Hefner MS	Oklahoma City	Putnam City	29%	23%	Exceeds Expectations	965
#104	B	Little Axe MS	Norman	Little Axe	29%	19%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	256
#105	B	Newman MS	Skiatook	Skiatook	29%	28%	Meets Expectations	508
#106	B	Owasso 8th Grade Ctr	Owasso	Owasso	29%	37%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	752
#107	B-	Duncan MS	Duncan	Duncan	29%	30%	Meets Expectations	753
#108	B-	Pauls Valley Jhs	Pauls Valley	Pauls Valley	29%	21%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	336
#109	B-	Sperry MS	Sperry	Sperry	29%	25%	Exceeds Expectations	232
#110	B-	Woodward MS South Campus	Woodward	Woodward	29%	34%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	378
#111	B-	Carnegie MS	Carnegie	Carnegie	28%	18%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	131
#112	B-	Chouteau Mazie MS	Chouteau	Chouteau-Mazie	28%	26%	Meets Expectations	211
#113	B-	Collinsville MS	Collinsville	Collinsville	28%	27%	Meets Expectations	462
#114	B-	Dewitt Waller MS	Enid	Enid	28%	32%	Meets Expectations	735
#115	B-	Hollis MS	Hollis	Hollis	28%	16%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	108
#116	B-	Lone Grove MS	Lone Grove	Lone Grove	28%	26%	Meets Expectations	305
#117	B-	Madison MS	Bartlesville	Bartlesville	28%	28%	Meets Expectations	732
#118	B-	Mannford MS	Mannford	Mannford	28%	22%	Exceeds Expectations	336
#119	B-	Muldrow MS	Muldrow	Muldrow	28%	24%	Exceeds Expectations	329
#120	B-	Newcastle MS	Newcastle	Newcastle	28%	31%	Meets Expectations	591
#121	B-	Pryor MS	Pryor	Pryor	28%	27%	Meets Expectations	650
#122	B-	Woodland Upper ES	Fairfax	Woodland	28%	17%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	81
#123	B-	Hartshorne MS	Hartshorne	Hartshorne	27%	15%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	165
#124	B-	Jay MS	Jay	JAY	27%	24%	Exceeds Expectations	248
#125	B-	Newkirk MS	Newkirk	Newkirk	27%	19%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	180
#126	B-	Rector Johnson MS	Broken Bow	Broken Bow	27%	22%	Exceeds Expectations	324
#127	B-	Spiro MS	Spiro	Spiro	27%	21%	Exceeds Expectations	202
#128	B-	Tishomingo MS	Tishomingo	Tishomingo	27%	22%	Exceeds Expectations	235
#129	C+	Adair MS	Adair	Adair	26%	22%	Exceeds Expectations	237
#130	C+	Beggs MS	Beggs	Beggs	26%	20%	Exceeds Expectations	287
#131	C+	Blackwell MS	Blackwell	Blackwell	26%	30%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	259
#132	C+	Elmore City Jhs	Elmore City	Elmore City-Pernell	26%	22%	Exceeds Expectations	107
#133	C+	Harrah MS	Harrah	Harrah	26%	25%	Meets Expectations	528
#134	C+	Irving MS	Norman	Norman	26%	25%	Meets Expectations	788
#135	C+	Morris MS	Morris	Morris	26%	20%	Exceeds Expectations	215
#136	C+	Prague MS	Prague	Prague	26%	22%	Exceeds Expectations	215
#137	C+	Roland MS	Roland	Roland	26%	16%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	195
#138	C+	Sulphur MS	Sulphur	Sulphur	26%	34%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	336
#139	C+	Wellston MS	Wellston	Wellston	26%	24%	Meets Expectations	126
#140	C+	Altus Jhs	Altus	Altus	25%	24%	Meets Expectations	491
#141	C+	Centennial MS	Broken Arrow	Broken Arrow	25%	36%	Underperforms Expectations	1,121
#142	C+	Haworth MS	Haworth	Haworth	25%	16%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	111
#143	C+	Kansas MS	Kansas	Kansas	25%	18%	Exceeds Expectations	173
#144	C+	Kellyville MS	Kellyville	Kellyville	25%	18%	Exceeds Expectations	107
#145	C+	Locust Grove MS	Locust Grove	Locust Grove	25%	22%	Exceeds Expectations	262
#146	C+	Oliver MS	Broken Arrow	Broken Arrow	25%	33%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	898
#147	C+	Sayre MS	Sayre	Sayre	25%	24%	Meets Expectations	174
#148	C+	Southeast MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	25%	27%	Meets Expectations	733
#149	C+	Tulsa Schl Arts Sciences MS (Charter)	Tulsa	Schl Arts/sci (charter)	25%	31%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	234
#150	C+	Virgil Cooper MS	Drumright	Drumright	25%	20%	Exceeds Expectations	93
#151	C	Ada Jhs	Ada	ADA	25%	21%	Exceeds Expectations	606
#152	C	Agra Jhs	Agra	Agra	25%	25%	Meets Expectations	46
#153	C	Carl Albert MS	Oklahoma City	Midwest City-Del City	25%	28%	Meets Expectations	834
#154	C	Longfellow MS	Norman	Norman	25%	24%	Meets Expectations	709
#155	C	Vian MS	Vian	Vian	25%	14%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	159
#156	C	Will Rogers Jhs	Claremore	Claremore	25%	24%	Meets Expectations	807
#157	C	Byng Jhs	Ada	Byng	24%	21%	Exceeds Expectations	357
#158	C	Childers MS	Broken Arrow	Broken Arrow	24%	34%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	796
#159	C	Cleveland MS	Cleveland	Cleveland	24%	23%	Meets Expectations	410
#160	C	Colbert MS	Colbert	Colbert	24%	19%	Exceeds Expectations	117
#161	C	Donald P Sloat Jhs	Coweta	Coweta	24%	32%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	561
#162	C	Meeker MS	Meeker	Meeker	24%	24%	Meets Expectations	162
#163	C	Stigler MS	Stigler	Stigler	24%	23%	Meets Expectations	354
#164	C	Apache MS	Apache	Boone-Apache	23%	21%	Meets Expectations	124
#165	C	Cooper MS	Oklahoma City	Putnam City	23%	18%	Exceeds Expectations	621
#166	C	Fletcher Jhs	Fletcher	Fletcher	23%	33%	Underperforms Expectations	77
#167	C	Lindsay MS	Lindsay	Lindsay	23%	28%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	234
#168	C	Oologah Talala MS	Oologah	Oologah-Talala	23%	35%	Underperforms Expectations	380
#169	C	Pawnee MS	Pawnee	Pawnee	23%	17%	Exceeds Expectations	143
#170	C	Ponca City West MS	Ponca City	Ponca City	23%	23%	Meets Expectations	686
#171	C	Rattan Jhs	Rattan	Rattan	23%	18%	Exceeds Expectations	74
#172	C	Union 8th Grade Ctr	Broken Arrow	Union	23%	23%	Meets Expectations	1,122
#173	C	Walters MS	Walters	Walters	23%	27%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	140
#174	C	West Jhs	Oklahoma City	Moore	23%	16%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	652
#175	C	Western Oaks MS	Bethany	Putnam City	23%	20%	Exceeds Expectations	656
#176	C-	Barnsdall Middle School	Barnsdall		22%	25%	Meets Expectations	95
#177	C-	Berryhill MS	Tulsa	Berryhill	22%	14%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	174
#178	C-	Clinton MS	Clinton	Clinton	22%	24%	Meets Expectations	282
#179	C-	Comanche MS	Comanche	Comanche	22%	20%	Meets Expectations	190
#180	C-	Dickson MS	Ardmore	Dickson	22%	24%	Meets Expectations	293
#181	C-	Emerson MS	Enid	Enid	22%	22%	Meets Expectations	401
#182	C-	Etta Dale Jhs	El Reno	El Reno	22%	18%	Exceeds Expectations	444
#183	C-	Fort Towson Jhs	Fort Towson	Fort Towson	22%	17%	Exceeds Expectations	45
#184	C-	Glenpool MS	Glenpool	Glenpool	22%	31%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	442
#185	C-	Hobart MS	Hobart	Hobart	22%	17%	Exceeds Expectations	163
#186	C-	Hulbert MS	Hulbert	Hulbert	22%	16%	Exceeds Expectations	121
#187	C-	Independence Charter MS (Charter)	Oklahoma City	Harding Independence (charter)	22%	21%	Meets Expectations	387
#188	C-	Luther MS	Luther	Luther	22%	29%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	239
#189	C-	Madill MS	Madill	Madill	22%	24%	Meets Expectations	373
#190	C-	Mcloud Jhs	Mcloud	Mcloud	22%	24%	Meets Expectations	289
#191	C-	Perkins Tryon MS	Perkins	Perkins-Tryon	22%	25%	Meets Expectations	356
#192	C-	Salina MS	Salina	Salina	22%	15%	Exceeds Expectations	159
#193	C-	Talihina Jhs	Talihina	Talihina	22%	19%	Exceeds Expectations	78
#194	C-	Central Jhs	Moore	Moore	21%	19%	Meets Expectations	615
#195	C-	Fairland MS	Fairland	Fairland	21%	26%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	133
#196	C-	Inola MS	Inola	Inola	21%	31%	Underperforms Expectations	275
#197	C-	Lexington MS	Lexington	Lexington	21%	23%	Meets Expectations	223
#198	C-	Macarthur MS	Lawton	Lawton	21%	31%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	865
#199	C-	North Rock Creek MS	Shawnee	North Rock Creek	21%	19%	Meets Expectations	150
#200	C-	Okeene JR SR HS JR	Okeene	Okeene	21%	29%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	46
#201	C-	Rush Springs MS	Rush Springs	Rush Springs	21%	26%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	108
#202	C-	Sallisaw MS	Sallisaw	Sallisaw	21%	23%	Meets Expectations	431
#203	C-	Wagoner MS	Wagoner	Wagoner	21%	19%	Meets Expectations	469
#204	C-	Sapulpa Jhs	Sapulpa	Sapulpa	19%	25%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	599
#205	D+	Smithville MS	Smithville	Smithville	21%	20%	Meets Expectations	55
#206	D+	Wallace Byrd MS	Coalgate	Coalgate	21%	15%	Exceeds Expectations	109
#207	D+	Waurika MS	Waurika	Waurika	21%	19%	Meets Expectations	100
#208	D+	Haskell MS	Haskell	Haskell	20%	15%	Exceeds Expectations	147
#209	D+	Highland West Jhs	Moore	Moore	20%	15%	Exceeds Expectations	545
#210	D+	Hinton MS	Hinton	Hinton	20%	22%	Meets Expectations	187
#211	D+	Kingston MS	Kingston	Kingston	20%	32%	Underperforms Expectations	286
#212	D+	Rongey MS	Kiefer	Kiefer	20%	27%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	136
#213	D+	Sapulpa MS	Sapulpa	Sapulpa	20%	25%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	487
#214	D+	Shawnee MS	Shawnee	Shawnee	20%	21%	Meets Expectations	711
#215	D+	Union 6th 7th Grade Ctr	Tulsa	Union	20%	27%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	2,182
#216	D+	Wyandotte MS	Wyandotte	Wyandotte	20%	18%	Meets Expectations	178
#217	D+	Ardmore MS	Ardmore	Ardmore	19%	16%	Exceeds Expectations	498
#218	D+	Davis MS	Davis	Davis	19%	25%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	264
#219	D+	Dewey MS	Dewey	Dewey	19%	26%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	269
#220	D+	Idabel MS	Idabel	Idabel	19%	23%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	253
#221	D+	Kipp Tulsa Acad College Prep (Charter)	Tulsa	Kipp (charter)	19%	9%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	321
#222	D+	Ninnekah MS	Ninnekah	Ninnekah	19%	22%	Meets Expectations	111
#223	D+	Sequoyah MS	Broken Arrow	Broken Arrow	19%	24%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	720
#224	D+	Welch MS	Welch	Welch	19%	21%	Meets Expectations	63
#225	D+	Crescent MS	Crescent	Crescent	18%	30%	Underperforms Expectations	89
#226	D+	Ponca City East MS	Ponca City	Ponca City	18%	26%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	353
#227	D+	Westville Jhs	Westville	Westville	18%	19%	Meets Expectations	132
#228	D	Alva MS	Alva	Alva	18%	39%	Underperforms Expectations	241
#229	D	Bristow MS	Bristow	Bristow	18%	22%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	380
#230	D	Crooked Oak MS	Oklahoma City	Crooked Oak	18%	10%	Greatly Exceeds Expectations	275
#231	D	Velma Alma MS	Velma	Velma-Alma	18%	24%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	102
#232	D	Astec Charter MS (Charter)	Oklahoma City	Astec Charters	17%	18%	Meets Expectations	393
#233	D	Shidler MS	Shidler	Shidler	17%	22%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	51
#234	D	Stroud MS	Stroud	Stroud	17%	25%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	195
#235	D	Wayne MS	Wayne	Wayne	17%	13%	Exceeds Expectations	99
#236	D	Wells MS	Catoosa	Catoosa	17%	24%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	405
#237	D	Anadarko MS	Anadarko	Anadarko	16%	13%	Exceeds Expectations	303
#238	D	Central High MS	Marlow	Central High	16%	34%	Underperforms Expectations	92
#239	D	Eisenhower MS	Lawton	Lawton	16%	23%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	1,035
#240	D	Flores Middle School (Charter)	Tulsa		16%	22%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	269
#241	D	Oklahoma Union MS	South Coffeyville	Oklahoma Union	16%	20%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	150
#242	D	Seminole MS	Seminole	Seminole	16%	14%	Meets Expectations	206
#243	D	Wewoka MS	Wewoka	Wewoka	16%	14%	Exceeds Expectations	91
#244	D	Bluejacket MS	Bluejacket	Bluejacket	15%	21%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	44
#245	D	Commerce MS	Commerce	Commerce	15%	18%	Meets Expectations	181
#246	D	Marietta MS	Marietta	Marietta	15%	22%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	252
#247	D	Quapaw MS	Quapaw	Quapaw	15%	14%	Meets Expectations	134
#248	D	Stilwell MS	Stilwell	Stilwell	15%	22%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	275
#249	D	Tecumseh MS	Tecumseh	Tecumseh	15%	22%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	451
#250	D	Thoreau Demonstration Academy	Tulsa	Tulsa	15%	25%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	442
#251	D	Tonkawa MS	Tonkawa	Tonkawa	15%	24%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	176
#252	D	Tulsa Honor Academy Charter (Charter)	Tulsa	Honor Academy(charter)	15%	12%	Exceeds Expectations	429
#253	D	Healdton MS	Healdton	Healdton	14%	19%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	115
#254	D	Longfellow MS	Enid	Enid	14%	17%	Meets Expectations	503
#255	D	Wynnewood MS	Wynnewood	Wynnewood	14%	21%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	214
#256	D-	James L Capps MS	Warr Acres	Putnam City	14%	20%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	975
#257	D-	Miami JR HS	Miami	Miami	14%	30%	Underperforms Expectations	529
#258	D-	Central Jhs	Guymon	Guymon	13%	23%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	438
#259	D-	Geronimo MS	Geronimo	Geronimo	13%	21%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	50
#260	D-	Hominy MS	Hominy	Hominy	13%	12%	Meets Expectations	118
#261	D-	Mayfield MS	Oklahoma City	Putnam City	13%	15%	Meets Expectations	850
#262	D-	Midwest City MS	Midwest City	Midwest City-Del City	13%	16%	Meets Expectations	1,046
#263	D-	Ringling Jhs	Ringling	Ringling	13%	20%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	87
#264	D-	Yale MS	Yale	Yale	13%	30%	Underperforms Expectations	74
#265	D-	Central MS	Lawton	Lawton	12%	19%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	994
#266	D-	Hugo MS	Hugo	Hugo	12%	14%	Meets Expectations	263
#267	D-	Weleetka Jhs	Weleetka	Weleetka	12%	16%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	75
#268	D-	6th And 7th Grade Academy	Muskogee	Muskogee	11%	16%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	563
#269	D-	Del City MS	Del City	Midwest City-Del City	11%	14%	Meets Expectations	925
#270	D-	Foyil Jhs	Foyil	Foyil	11%	20%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	96
#271	D-	Henryetta MS	Henryetta	Henryetta	11%	18%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	242
#272	D-	Liberty Middle School	Mounds		11%	29%	Underperforms Expectations	78
#273	D-	Millwood Arts Academy MS	Oklahoma City	Millwood	11%	10%	Meets Expectations	260
#274	D-	Nowata MS	Nowata	Nowata	11%	20%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	163
#275	D-	Okemah MS	Okemah	Okemah	11%	14%	Meets Expectations	162
#276	D-	Arkoma MS	Arkoma	Arkoma	10%	15%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	106
#277	D-	Caney Valley MS	Ramona	Caney Valley	10%	23%	Underperforms Expectations	167
#278	D-	Chelsea MS	Chelsea	Chelsea	10%	18%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	162
#279	D-	Dewar MS	Dewar	Dewar	10%	11%	Meets Expectations	119
#280	D-	Konowa Junior High School	Konawa	Konawa	10%	21%	Underperforms Expectations	90
#281	D-	Memorial MS	Tulsa	Tulsa	10%	14%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	626
#282	D-	Panama MS	Panama	Panama	10%	17%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	104
#283	F	8th And 9th Grade Academy	Muskogee	Muskogee	15%	22%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	631
#284	F	Boswell MS	Boswell	Boswell	9%	17%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	47
#285	F	Pawhuska MS	Pawhuska	Pawhuska	9%	15%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	152
#286	F	Seiling JR SR HS JR	Seiling	Seiling	9%	22%	Underperforms Expectations	86
#287	F	Roosevelt MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	8%	10%	Meets Expectations	853
#288	F	Will Rogers College MS	Tulsa	Tulsa	8%	18%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	694
#289	F	Central MS	Tulsa	Tulsa	7%	11%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	293
#290	F	Daniel Webster MS	Tulsa	Tulsa	7%	15%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	350
#291	F	Dunbar Intermediate ES	Okmulgee	Okmulgee	7%	14%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	322
#292	F	Geary MS	Geary	Geary	7%	17%	Underperforms Expectations	53
#293	F	Taft MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	7%	17%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	1,045
#294	F	Capitol Hill MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	6%	12%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	669
#295	F	East Central Middle School	Tulsa		6%	22%	Underperforms Expectations	987
#296	F	Jefferson MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	6%	11%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	919
#297	F	Monroe Demonstration MS	Tulsa	Tulsa	6%	9%	Meets Expectations	688
#298	F	Tulsa Met Middle School	Tulsa		6%	28%	Underperforms Expectations	53
#299	F	Western Heights MS	Oklahoma City	Western Heights	6%	11%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	442
#300	F	John Marshall MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	5%	15%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	626
#301	F	Moon MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	5%	10%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	679
#302	F	Nathan Hale Middle School	Tulsa		5%	22%	Underperforms Expectations	782
#303	F	Webster MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	5%	9%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	810
#304	F	Wheeler MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	5%	11%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	538
#305	F	Mary Golda Ross MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	4%	10%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	819
#306	F	Traice MS	Tulsa	Tulsa	4%	14%	Doesn't Meet Expectations	229
#307	F	Rogers Middle School	Oklahoma City		3%	17%	Underperforms Expectations	266
#308	F	Putnam Heights Academy MS	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	0%	19%	Underperforms Expectations	34

How Oklahoma's middle schools compare

A: 66B: 62C: 76D: 78F: 26

42% of the 308 ranked middle schools in Oklahoma earn an A or B (66 A grades, 62 B, 76 C, 78 D, 26 F), against 46% of middle schools nationwide. 206 schools meet or beat the proficiency projected from their student context (67% here, 70% nationally), and 122 exceed it. On average 25% of tested students meet the state bar against a projected 24% (national averages: 45% actual, 38% projected).

The biggest overperformers, by actual proficiency above projection: Chisholm MS (63% against 27%, A+), Thomas Fay Custer Unified Jhs (51% against 21%, A+), Minco MS (45% against 20%, A+), Dove Science Academy MS (44% against 20%, A+), Bethany MS (59% against 36%, A+).

Districts with the most schools in the top quarter (the top 77): Edmond (5), Moore (3), Mustang (3), Oklahoma City (2).

Cities with the most ranked middle schools: Oklahoma City (29, 8 at A or B), Tulsa (18, 2 at A or B), Edmond (8, 8 at A or B), Broken Arrow (6, 1 at A or B), Norman (5, 3 at A or B).

The largest ranked middle schools: Union 6th 7th Grade Ctr (2,182 students, D+, #215), Jenks MS (1,831 students, A-, #50), Yukon MS (1,407 students, B+, #74).

Of the top 25, 0 are magnet schools and 1 is a charter. Selective and specialised schools tend to post high actual scores; the projection column is the fairer comparison for a neighborhood school.

Middle schools in Oklahoma that are not ranked

12 graded middle schools are listed here rather than ranked, each for the reason given. Every one has its own page with its full SchoolGrade report.

Special-purpose schools (1)

Alternative, special-education and vocational schools serve a different mission and a different student body, so they are graded but not ranked against regular schools.

F Emerson Alternative Ed MS, Oklahoma City

Fully online schools (4)

Statewide virtual schools draw students from everywhere, so a place ranking is not a fair comparison.

C Eschool Virtual Charter MS, Guthrie
F Insight School Of Oklahoma MS, Midwest City
D+ Okla Virtual Charter Acad MS, Midwest City
B- Oklahoma Connections Acad MS, Bartlesville

Not yet graded (7)

Our source data has no school-level proficiency results for these schools, so they carry no SchoolGrade yet.

Dove Virtual Academy Middle School, Edmond
Fort Cobb Broxton MS, Fort Cobb
Oklahoma Schl For The Blind MS, Muskogee
Pond Creek Hunter MS, Pond Creek
Puterbaugh MS, Mcalester
Sovereign Community Schl Ms, Oklahoma City
Star Spencer MS, Oklahoma City

About this ranking

Scope: every public middle school in Oklahoma.
Order: SchoolGrade, then actual proficiency, then name; schools with the same grade and score share a rank.
Ranked: regular public schools that NCES lists as open, not fully online, with at least 30 students. Others are listed with the reason.
Tags: Magnet and Charter from the NCES school directory; K-12 marks schools serving every grade that are ranked with the middle schools.
Grades are the 2025-26 SchoolGrade model. How SchoolGrade works

Questions about middle schools in Oklahoma

What is the best middle school in Oklahoma?

Chisholm MS in Enid ranks first among the 308 ranked middle schools in Oklahoma with a SchoolGrade of A+, 63% of tested students meeting the state bar against a projected 27%.

How are middle schools in Oklahoma ranked?

By SchoolGrade, the 2025-26 model that scores each school's actual test proficiency against the level projected for its student context, then by actual proficiency to break ties. Regular public schools that are open, not fully online and have at least 30 students are ranked; the rest are listed below the table with the reason.

How many middle schools does Oklahoma have?

SchoolGrade grades 320 public middle schools in Oklahoma; 308 are ranked here and 12 are listed as not ranked.